On the future of weaving. Sara Lamb had a post a few days ago on this topic. She does wonderful work which has been featured in Spin-Off and probably lots of other magazines, which I am afraid I’ll mis-cite. I especially love her silk Andean bands. Scrumptious. She’s been wondering about where weaving is headed, and why more young people don’t seem to be taking up the practice. (Notice how I so aptly avoided labeling it as “art” or “craft”? Not a debate I want to get into today. Another time maybe). As a lapsed but ever hopeful weaver, I have some opinions…
1. I began weaving about 15 years ago. At that time, I attended guild meetings regularly, subscribed to all the weaving magazines I could get my hands on (Weavers, you are missed!) and read weaving lists religiously. There were a handful of topics that kept coming up on those lists over and over and over. One was the art/craft question. One was how to sell your stuff, how to set prices. One was why conferences are so expensive. One was… “where are all the young weavers?” No-one had any answers then. I’m not convinced the situation is significantly more dire now than it was more than a decade ago, though I’m open to persuasion.
2. The space issue is real. I didn’t believe this when I started weaving—because I had a full finished basement I used as a weaving studio! When I moved to a different city, into about ¼ of the space I had been used to, I resolved not to let that stop my weaving. I kept my 24” fold-up loom, regretfully gave away my 45” Nilus, and figured I’d become a specialist in kimono-type couture, you know, clothing creatively pieced out of narrow panels. The reality is, I’ve only had two or three warps on the loom in as many years. There are other issues, definitely, but the space issue is real. When you don’t have large blocks of dedicated time, the various steps of warping, winding, threading and so on can seem to take forever and more to the point, take up a lot of space. It’s one thing to have a nicely warped loom with the cloth part woven in your spare bedroom. It’s another to have a loom in the middle of being warped, with chains of yarn all over the floor, piles of sticks, extra threads, lease sticks, etc etc etc.... not such an asset to décor.
3. The time issue is real. Everyone my age that I know works too much to weave seriously. (Well, all the women anyway.) We are building careers, building families, or both. I don’t know anyone whose life lends itself to the kind of time—and not just time but blocks of time--that weaving requires. I used to get up very very early in the morning to make sure I had time to weave. That was when my work week was only 40 hours. Now, when my work will essentially fill whatever time it’s given… does that mean I’ve sold out and I’m not a truly dedicated weaver? Maybe. But I don’t think it’s just me; periodically studies come out about the number of hours in an average work week and surprise, it’s not 40. Add in commute time, cooking time, try to have a social life time, and there’s not much left.
4. Not meaning to offend anyone, and asking pardon in advance for any suggestion of stereotype… I know individual situations differ extremely. But for many people my age, social realities are different than for women born 20 or 30 years earlier. I was once at a weaving conference where a well-know weaver gave a talk to a packed auditorium and one of the first things she said was “I have a patron of the arts. His name is—“ and named her husband. Well—good for her. Lots of the rest of us don’t have that luxury. I could be an expert in lampas too, if I didn’t have to work. I could run an indigo vat too if I were home all day. I could write THE book on you-name-it if someone else was willing to buy all my supplies, pay the mortgage and the utilities, and let me weave all day long five days a week. Obviously this doesn’t apply to everyone, because there are many, many dedicated women of all ages who work and struggle to do things on their own and don’t have the support of a patron of any kind. But I confess, it bothers me when women who say they’ve never had to work outside the home wonder why younger ones don’t dedicate more time to weaving. (And just so we’re clear, I am NOT suggesting that Sara falls into this category by any means. I do not mean to reflect negatively on her queries in any way.)
5. The guild issues are very, very real. I used to attend guild meetings regularly and yes, once helped in a tiny way to plan a huge conference. When I changed cities, I found that the local guild met out of reach of public transport, and in the middle of a weekday. ??? And how do you think you’re going to attract young weavers that way? I was able to attend a guild meeting once (only because I was giving a talk, so I was able to cadge time off work for “professional” reasons) and it seems like a great group of people, some excellent weavers, lots of enthusiasm, and the kind of accumulated knowledge that leaves you in awe. Still—there’s no way I can take a day off once a month. It’s just not realistic.
6. The intellectual issues are real. For all knitters’ angst over the gauge game, the sett/fiber/tie-up/treadlin-order-what-if/finishing game is much more complex and likely to be bewildering, unless you really thrive on challenge. The variables in weaving are numerous and not always well defined. I don’t think there should be value judgements attached to what kind of weaving someone chooses to do—privileging structure over colorful plain weave doesn’t do anyone any good and just leads to shaft envy and similar resentments. And after all, perfect plain weave is harder than it looks. I do think though, for me, that the interesting corners of the field are the places where the boundaries get pushed and experimentation is done. It’s difficult to do this without a sound understanding of drafting, the properties of different structures, and how to manipulate your tools to achieve what you want. It takes intellectual effort, and not all of those who work with yarn are willing to give that effort.
7. In my opinion, we do ourselves a disservice by aiming for quick grab ‘em projects to get new weavers involved. If we come up with a successful weaving equivalent of the fun fur knitted scarf, I do not think it will ultimately be to our benefit. Already we have weaving conferences filled with non-weaving seminars. One of my main complaints about conferences I’ve been to is that the quality of even the weaving seminars is at such a basic level that in many instances, you might as well just sit down with a cup of tea and a copy of van der Hoogt’s handbook and review what you already know. (Complex Weaver’s Seminars are notable exceptions to this generality). Weaving is not a practice that leads to quick gratification. No-one should be discouraged from trying it, but neither do I think we should varnish it to make it appear all easy or simple. If weaving becomes a series of weekend recipies for mug rugs, we are doomed.
8. A comment which I hope is out of date… last time I was keeping track, a lot of the everyday wearable items being produced with handwovens weren’t that appealing. Maybe one issue is that to have a finished object, you often need to add other skill sets to weaving. Some sewing is usually required, even if you just need to hem table linens. Many weavers say they are terrible seamstresses. Judging by some finished garments I’ve seen, I’d say there are times when this is not an exaggeration. Then too, what’s fun to weave doesn’t necessarily make good clothing (or curtains or whatever). If creating something to wear is a strong motivator for indulging in a fiber hobby, as it seems to be for many knitters, then we need to find attractive current styles that can be made with handwovens. Unfortunately, I don’t have any solutions to this one right now, but some solutions probably involve finer setts, which again ups the time involved. A sort of vicious circle…
9. In the end, I’m not as concerned with how many weavers there are as with how good they are. Increasing the weaving population ten-fold doesn’t help me as a weaver if 90% of them only want to follow printed directions for the latest cushion/handbag/tablerunner/scarf in plain weave stripes. I don’t feel squeamish about saying this because as someone who was a knitter long before the current craze, I can honestly say that the cheap chunky simple get ‘em going knit faddish stuff leaves me cold. I’m not saying people shouldn’t publish it and make it, but the sum total of what it adds to the knowledge base of knitting is, imho, negligible. Similarly, I could die happy if I never ever saw another recipe for a woven chenille scarf. The real weavers, the ones who stick with it, will, I believe, appreciate the more challenging stuff: doubleweave, damask, collapse, pique, pick your favorite. Even if they never try it all (because who has time to try everything?) they will appreciate that it’s there, and that is what will keep us moving forward.
Over the past few years I’ve done a lot more studying of woven cloth than I’ve done weaving myself. Thanks, Sara, for getting me thinking seriously about it again and prompting me to remember the challenges and intricacies of weaving.