It’s a bright sunny day and I had a lovely morning run in the 20-degree dawn. Leaving me feeling cheerful and disposed to find happiness in small things.
I wore my new lace kneesocks today, and they only slipped down about 3/8 of an inch during the mile and a quarter walk to work. This may have something to do with the stockings underneath, but even so, I am quite pleased because my handknit socks can get in the habit of congregating around my ankles. Moving upwards, I’m also wearing a new corduroy skirt which is, for once, precisely fitted to my body. In fact when I put it on I almost wondered if I’d made it too tight, but I think it’s just a matter of getting used to having things rest at my waist instead of on my hipbones. (Not that I am a person who shows the flesh between my bellybutton and hipbones. No. I assure you. Low-slung skirt, long sweater, that’s me.) Finally, in getting bundled up this morning I rummaged around in the cedar chest and pulled out an Andean hat covered with colorful tiny bobbles. Having this vibrant creation on my head was a great joy during the walk to work.
But now, the really exciting part: last night I went to see a play called “The Provok’d Wife”. It was written in 16-something and is absolutely hilarious. Ribald, bawdy, and did I mention full of innuendo? It’s about all kinds of humorous situations, such as how to conduct a refined adultery in a lecherous society, or vice versa, what to do when love overtakes you unawares, and the just desserts of a vain vapid arrogant high-class lady who believes that all gentlemen should swoon for her. Oh was I pleased to see her lose a man to a plain “dull” girl with glasses! Leaving aside the ingenious scenery (stairs and room modules that slid in and out of the wings), the comments on marriage (a fate to be avoided at all costs) and the amusing incidents of cross-dressing and deceit, let’s discuss the costumes.
Oh how I love good costumes! In this case the play was staged as a cross between watteau sheperdess and 1950’s debutante. The lead woman wore high heels, a panniered skirt with bustle, and a close fitting low-necked top in floral knit, with a pearl choker and an elaborate Audrey Hepburn french twist hairdo. The second woman appeared first in a blue plaid dress that had a triangular stomacher shape but also reminded one of gingham. Later this skirt appeared paired with a tight argyle sweater—still with the wide hips and supported posterior. Some of the more outrageous things were a puce green fur mantle with a deep hood, and a matching muff in the shape of a puppy dog. (I told you it was hilarious!) A voluminous cape in bubblegum pink covered from hood to heels with rows of wispy feathers. Brocade corsets, fuschia satin panniers. Platform shoes painted in camouflage to match a full-length cloak in hideous camouflage print, for the scene where the lady hides herself to spy on her rivals. I especially loved the undergarments, in part because I love corsets anyway and in part because they were just so sexy! White satin stays laced up the back, worn with satin hip rolls, lacy knickers, and thigh-high stockings. Black strapless corsets with flouncy black petticoats and purple stockings. Panniers covered in black tulle ruffles.
Above all, I lust for the frockcoats. Not for the men inside them, but for their clothes. Wide collars, pleated skirts in back, extravagant cuffs. In opulent brocade. Would that I could find such fabric! I would, I really would wear a knee-length frockcoat in colorful brocade, with a ruffly shirt and tight pants and high lace-up boots. Or a frockcoat over a velvet waistcoat with a standing collar. Or a frockcoat over a slinky narrow dress, or over a short skirt showing lots of stocking. This is enough to send me straight to Amazon to order the Janet Arnold books I don’t already own. (detailed cuts of historical clothing, for those crazy people like me who love to know how things are put together).
Thank God for fantasy and creativity and history. What a delight.